Christmas is a Christian holiday -- U.N. liberals say so

There's always a paradox in the way  non-religious liberals attack Christianity. (NOTE: I am not calling all liberals non-religious. I am clarifying which liberals I am talking about.)

Contradictions can be found in most of their arguments. This one hit me today -- Bah Humbug, Christmas Trees not allowed at Climate Conference. The U.N. has banned Christmas trees from the world's largest climate conference, citing the fact that a religious holiday should not be acknowledged at a U.N. event, basing the argument on the fact that Christmas is, in face, a religious holiday.

I have very often read articles and quotes from non-religious types, who blame Christians for "taking over" a secular holiday. They claim the celebration of the winter solstice was stolen by Christians who are just trying to take every holiday away from them and make it religious.

So I wonder why these liberal types who say Christmas isn't even Christian would ban the Christmas tree. After all, the Christmas tree is really a secular symbol. They are not, say, banning nativity scenes from the conference.

I know Christmas, CHRISTmas, is a sacred, religious Christian holiday. But many non-religious types (I dare say who are all at the helm of this conference) say it's not. It's a celebration of the winter solstice. So if that's true, why ban the Christmas tree?

I think I will hold on to this article for the next time I read about how Christmas was never supposed to be Christian. Because now they've acknowledged that in fact it is.

Just thinkin...